CFPB Announces Proposed Settlement of Lawsuit Alleging Short-Term Loan Provider Violated UDAAP Ban on CFPA Under Deposit Account Program | Ballard Spahr srl


CFPB announced last week that he entered into a proposed settlement with Driver Loan, LLC (“Driver Loan”) and its CEO to settle the lawsuit in November 2020 that he filed against Driver Loan and its CEO alleging that the defendants engaged in deceptive acts and practices in violation of the UDAAP prohibition of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to the receipt of deposits and the granting of loans to consumers.

In his complaint Filed in Florida Federal District Court, the CFPB alleged that, since 2017, Driver Loan has offered consumers short-term, high-interest loans. He also alleged that in 2020 Driver Loan started receiving deposits from consumers to fund their loans. The CFPB alleged that the defendants engaged in deceptive practices by:

  • Falsely represent that consumer deposits were held in FDIC insured institutions and would have a guaranteed rate of return.
  • Market your loans as having an APR of 440% while actual APRs were above 900%.

An act or practice is considered deceptive in violation of the UDAAP prohibition if there is a material representation or omission of information likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably in the circumstances. In support of its claim that the defendants’ false statements regarding deposit accounts were misleading, the Bureau alleged that a consumer acting reasonably in the circumstances would believe that Driver Loan offered a safe product. According to the Bureau, because the interest rates charged by Driver Loan were usurious under Florida criminal law, the defendants created a significant risk that Driver Loan would not be able to collect or meet overdue loans. its obligations to consumers who sought to withdraw deposited funds.

The proposed final judgment and order would require defendants to reimburse approximately $ 1 million in consumer deposits and pay a civil fine of $ 100,000. It would also permanently prohibit defendants from engaging in deposit collection activities and making deceptive statements to consumers.


Comments are closed.